Revised: May 12, 2000

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

Local Authority staff   - VIOLATIONS -  in law

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER, just as the days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights. (ECoHR) 

Article 9.  "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."

Article 10.    "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION....to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".

Article 11.   "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of  ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".

Article 13.  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights.   NOTE PLEASE:  We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our view) by the Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told and the multitude of facts we publish PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT TO THE average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more as  illiterate serfs of  the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives*, which they fail to declare.

We publish below a 'Times' Law Report. It covers aspects attached to Shorthold Tenancy Agreements. No sooner had the judgement been pronounced by the Court of Appeal and a member of staff from Haringey Council, was writing to the landlady and her agent to promote assertions contrary to the true facts in the case he was alluding to and irrespective of the true legal position. The author of the letter, which we also publish on this page further down, we understand is no longer employed at Haringey Council.  We have on record, however, other issues and documented facts that we may be caused to publish in these pages if public servants carry on ignoring Parliament's Law. The questionable activities of Public Servants within Local Authorities, such as Haringey Council in North London, have been the subject of well documented presentations and complaints by us. We have been waiting for over a year for a dreamer within its confines, to set down one complaint for presentation to the council's own review panel.  He has persistently defaulted to do so with intent simply because he knows that in another case the fraudulent demands his staff were seeking to impose on a targeted victim, a private landlord, ended at that stage without the need for theatrical productions outside the council's confines because the LAW id the LAW and facts are facts.

Most if not ALL problems that arise out of questionable practices by council staff who act in contempt of 'The Law'* and the principles of law rest on assertions and on alleged directives from above and 'the regulations' the staff 'adhere to' in presumed ignorance of 'The LAW' and irrespective of the dictum "Ignorance of The LAW is no defence". Irrespective of the law as it was at the time of the Law report we publish below, public servants (Court Officers and staff) and two firms of solicitors were indulging themselves and looked forward to convert RENTS DUE AND PAYABLE, to a landlord,  to alleged legitimate legal costs through the usual theatrical scenarios and presentations  by 'legal boffins' irrespective of the facts and the law applicable in that instance. All had been arranged through and care of the Housing Benefit manipulators who work with and for dishonest tenants,  the 'legal boffins' as the council's own legal experts arrange through directives to the blind and the illiterate in law staff, and third parties.  In the instance, we refer to, the facts were and ARE fully documented. The criminal activities and the indictable offences, in breach of Parliament's Laws, were reported to the police. 'The LAW' document which is published on this web-site, for the benefit of all UK citizens and residents, covers it all. Nonetheless the criminals, in that instance were encouraged to institute civil court proceedings against the landlady and her agent; their legal boffins alleged wrongful eviction, within five months of the Court of Appeal Law Report, irrespective of the fact they DID INDULGE IN A MOONLIGHT FLIGHT three days after they were served with a Default Summons resting on thousands of pounds of unpaid rents. They failed for months to pay their rents because their Housing Benefit claim had not been processed, allegedly by the dishonest within the confines of the local authority Housing Benefit and social services department. The dishonest tenants were assisted by council staff to disappear to undeclared destination, a council property, as soon as they were served with a Default Summons. Over �4000 in unpaid rents BECAUSE THEIR HOUSING BENEFIT ALLEGEDLY HAD NOT BEEN PROCESSED FOR OVER FOUR MONTHS. They assaulted the managing agent who took steps to protect the rights in law of his principal; they caused criminal damages to properties; they inflicted serious life threatening injuries, and they caused permanent physical damage to the agent. The legal boffins were looking forward to their field days in court. An affidavit was settled by the victim of the assaults; it was lodged at court; it was served on both solicitors by the agent of the landlord.  One solicitor was acting for the intended victim, the landlady, and the other was acting for the dishonest tenant. The agent needed no legal boffin to represent him; his affidavit and his actions put an end to the dreams of all. The Lord Chancellor will be challenged in due course to look up and investigate at least FOUR case files all of which were issued out of 'the relevant county court' as the author of the intimidating letter from Haringey Council referred to the court without realising he was spilling the beans as to the expectations of all. The agent kept the CoA ruling up his sleeve in the event the solicitors and the relevant county court should proceed with the abuse of legal AID FACILITIES through which to convert rents, owed to the victim landlord, to alleged legal fees.  ALL was instigated by and care of the dishonest who organise(d) the constructive frauds through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds and council facilities at their disposal.  THEIR DISHONESTY and LIES, the deceptions they promote(d) rested on alleged regulations and non process of the Housing Benefit Applications because of any one of myriad of excuses they concoct(ed) as they went / go as long. Their activities in contravention of Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Law Report, from 'The Times',  we publish below. It is succinct and clear: "NO DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL EVICTION" in a matter of Shorthold Tenancy Agreements. Even in the case the Court of Appeal was called upon to determine on appeal from a county court. In that instance the tenants actually were evicted without proper notice and or other cause and reason safe the fact that the property owner had sold it as an empty property and on a vacant possession basis. 

The letter received from a member of staff / officer operating out of Haringey Council, we publish below. The author's area of operations was 'tenant relations'. No doubt, COUNCIL TENANTS, not private landlord and tenant business. The author took it upon himself to use his office in order to promote and offer services to others through use of council paper and facilities.  He was leaving telephone messages for the agent of the property owner to contact him; he was asked to write of his interest and or concern in private not council tenancy business.  He obliged.  Upon receipt of the letter the agent simply telephoned and ADVISED the abuser of public office to go to the nearest public library;  to look up the above Law Report in The Times and to cease interfering in the affairs and the rights of private landlords. The author was specifically told to cease dreaming up concocted evictions 'without the sanction of the relevant county court'.  He was informed that the young lady he was alluding to:  (a) had given notice to her landlady, (b) SHE HAD IN FACT MOVED OUT TAKING WITH HER MOST OF HER PRIVATE belongings, (c) she in fact handed over the property and (d) the young lady was indebted well in excess of �1000 to her landlady. He was further told that the fact the landlady had not issued a Default Summons rested on the hard luck story of the young lady; it appeared to be a re-run of the circumstances under which the niece of our founder committed suicide; a grossly indifferent and selfish father whose priorities were his personal grandiose plans and life-style at the expense of many others. We point out our guidelines and principle: "In a true Democracy no one has the right to indulge in whatever rights he assumes for personal gratification / gain / whatever at the expense of and or the violations of the rights of MANY OTHERS".   Sadly in the United Kingdom any individual is encouraged to act as he or she feels like. In breach of Parliament's Laws because the violations of the rights of others generate work and theatrical production opportunities for the Law  Enforcement Agencies, the members of which thus have their cat and mouse field days as in 'The Police Summons the Victim'* case qualifies and in 'The Breeding Grounds'* case was contemplated and attempted by the young policeman who asserted as an SS officer in Nazi occupied Europe "You want his address? Get your solicitor to write to me at the police station".   (Note: copy of the Appeal set down in The Breeding Grounds case can be secured from <[email protected]> include 'request copy' in the subject line specifying case).

We publish below one of the NEWSPAPER REPORTS covering the facts of life in Haringey, North London. OUR FOUNDER CAUSED the Daily Mail to commission its own investigation in 1997 in the matter of publicly funded bodies wasting through fraud* and criminal activities Social Security funds. The scams EXPOSED in the local papers followed years of frustrating work and volumes of paper work that was imposed by the corrupt and the corrupted; many had been closing their ears and their eyes, and had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored the evidence and the facts of life within Haringey Council safe that certain actions taken were only pre-emtive activities because of the expressed intention to publish material, facts and documents on the Internet for our citizens to get to know of the abuses of public office and for the the world to marvel at the capabilities of the dishonest and how they get protected by the authorities in the mother of modern Democracy. The documented evidence, masses of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored by any decent citizen, however, and the evidence and attempts predate the exposure by Councillor Peter Forrest.

Our founder first became aware of the facts of life in March/April 1996. For months lies and fabrications (recorded, audio tapes) attached to inexcusable falsehoods (fully covered by 'The LAW'* document published on our web-site) were advanced, promoted and relied upon by the deceivers and the dishonest within the confines of Haringey Council. In the words of Conservative councillor Peter Forrest "...Councils like Haringey are clearly a soft touch for employees who know how to work the system". A number of the staff apparently did; some were sacked others received prison and community service sentences; others are being investigated. The councillor failed to consider the myriad of victim landlords such as the one who,  with her agent between March and September 1996, contacted the Conservative office in Lordship Lane and left copies of papers with the office staff.  Even as we put these pages together now, to which we added some details of the facts of life in Haringey, we are still waiting for 'The LAW' to be applied in a very serious case of FORGERIES used and relied upon by the criminals within the confines of Haringey Council. Through the Forgeries the theft of and the denial of access to the properties of the targeted victims; the private landlords that Parliament's Law and the police are meant to protect; the private landlords seen and treated as easy prey by the dishonest who relied and still appear to be relying on 'public servants to default in their public duties' and to 'misconduct in public office'*.  We will not hesitate to  publish full details, and some of the documented evidence and the names of all offending parties IF THE INTENDED VICTIMS are not fully recompensed in every respect.  All who acted outside 'The Law' should now get their act together and co-operate as they have done for years now and they must reverse the process they embarked upon.  The victims should receive forthwith the rents they ARE OWED and they have been denied access to for far too long through THE SCAMS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ONE AND ALL INDULGED IN at Haringey Council through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds and facilities at the command of persons who know how to work the system, just as we know they have been doing for years. It is the duty of the police to investigate, if in fact the missing funds were ever paid to and or BANKED by the tenants. Cleared effects evidence can be secured from BACS and the Council's own accounts department.  WE secured such evidence in other cases and council staff co-operated in those circumstances; it is for the police to investigate and to find out why the council staff failed to comply with the requests and demands in the present case.

Below we publish an article from 'Haringey INDEPENDENT' of May 23rd 1997, a local paper.  It qualifies HOW one member of staff,   managed to swindle his 'employers' out of  �100,000 in bogus Housing benefit claims. The Housing Benefit funds, however, did not belong to his employers as the trial judge stated in his summing up. The funds had been secured from central government as HOUSING BENEFIT FROM THE SOCIAL FUND.  The article qualifies that the scam came to light because a vigilant citizen,  who was looking after a neighbour's empty property,  spotted a number of cheques with bogus names in the empty property owner's mail.  In the meantime no prosecutions for deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations, false documents and blatant MISAPPROPRIATION AND THEFT OF HOUSING BENEFIT FUNDS care of private arrangements between the dishonest tenants, the staff of the local authority and the local police who even chose to ignore the violent assault on the agent who ended up in hospital with a punctured vein haemorrhaging and a severely damaged top arm necessitating 17 months of physiotherapy to improve the condition of the arm to less than 50% usability with residual continuous pain.   ALL these care of the dishonest in public office who are ready willing and able to offer invisible services to the dishonest and to the merchants of physical pain and human agony.  Promotion of CRIME.   The criminals in that instance WERE MOVED by council staff to a local authority property within three days of service of a Default Summons issued out of a county court.   THAT ACTIVITY alone constituted an indictable offence because the council staff were ASSISTING persons with existing liabilities to evade meeting their contracted liabilities; the rush to an undisclosed address was but an activity intended to create a NO DEFAULT JUDGEMENT situation through assertions that 'no proof the Defendants were served with the Summons'.  ALL scenarios care of the HOUSING BENEFITS CRIMINAL INDUSTRY.  Officially endorsed ?

We publish also below the news release after an explicit Defence and Counterclaim was filed at a county court in response to a claim by a local authority for 'an alleged recoverable Housing Benefit overpayment'. There followed attempts to bury the counterclaim by a judge acting alone who issued an order striking the Counterclaim out without any hearing, any application to that effect by anyone, and without a summons by any one, not even from the court on its own motion. An explicit APPEAL was lodged thereafter and the Lord Chancellor was thus assisted to proceed with the announcement of the BILL of RIGHTS. The headline intriguing "Bill or Rights WILL MAKE MORALITY PART OF LAW".  Odd that we were mistaken into believing that morality WAS the law, as Parliament always intended; morality was divorced from the law because individuals serving the LAW elected to ignore it because of misinterpreting and treating 'impartiality provisions' as simple independence of the rule of law. We noted with great interest the words covering the proposed and intended tools under the Bill whereby ".... the courts would now have the power to give effect to the convention rights in the course of proceedings when they arose in this country and grant relief against an unlawful act of a public authority".  We need only stated that on Appeal the Counterclaim was restored and without the need for a full blown hearing at court the local authority's representative was caused to enter a non-suite case as goaded by the presiding court officer, after attempts had been made by the local authority legal boffins to railroad the case with assistance from the chief clerk of the court. It necessitated a succinctly explicit communication to the chief clerk with a demand that the communication be recorded and placed on file.

Copies of the Defence and Counterclaim and of the Appeal lodged at court can be secured on application to <[email protected].> by including in the subject line "request for copy" and stating the case in the text of email/communication.

BELOW the headlines clear. The FACTS about Housing in Haringey published in the issue of  Haringey Advertiser of April 14th 1999.   The article covers the convenient 'organised disorganisation' of which our founder wrote often enough to the Chief Executive and to many other employees.  It is an area in which the staff and officers of Haringey Council excel at as we discovered in 1996; this setting aside deceptions by the score and dishonesties galore. Working with and for other ulterior goals than PUBLIC SERVICES for which ALL are retained by Haringey Council at the expense of all tax contributing members of the public.

NONE SIGNED AND RETURNED OUR 'DECLARATION' document. From the Chief Executive to senior officers down the ranks of their power house. It is for the public who acquaint themselves with its content to consider why they declined, refused and or ignored our 'sign the declaration'  invitation; presumably because they are all infallible, invincible and or above 'The LAW', super beings.   The public should also consider the judge's comment to the legal team representing Garry Glitter when he declined to take the stand in the course of his trial not long ago; the same inferences should apply to those who did not complete and return the document.

We simply draw attention to the opening words in the article of Hornsey and Crouch End Journal of Thursday 31 December 1998, following our letter of 18 December to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary:  "THE GOVERNMENT has agreed to step in to solve Haringey's homelessness crisis".   Surely what Haringey needs is sound business management of the finances available to it. Also PROPER USE of its own property assets before the dishonest and criminally motivated staff within its confines are allowed, let alone guided how, to interfere in the rights of others; in particular in the rights of creators in our society, the private residential property owners. Who but their own legal boffins create the situations through alleged 'confidentiality stipulations' between themselves and those they consciously and or with intent ASSIST to steal the properties of others?  

Link to:  h-r Home Page   The Declaration    The LAW   ECoHR(rights)   Our Aims

Link to:  Police Summons the victim   The Breeding Grounds    Waste Social Funds   

Revised: May 12, 2000.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.